where is the baby from nirvana nevermind cover

Nevermind’s artwork has long been considered iconic in terms of 20th and 21st-century popular imagery. We are confident that Spencer will be allowed to move forward with his case.” The significance of the artwork is likely to be scrutinized further given that the baby in the image, now grown up, has decided to sue Nirvana and Kurt Cobain’s estate on grounds of alleged child exploitation and pornography. Why am I still on their cover if I’m not that big of a deal?”Įdlen’s lawyer, Robert Lewis of the Marsh Law Firm, told Artnet News in a statement that “in accordance with the court’s order, we will be filing a second amended complaint very soon. “I was getting referred to their managers and their lawyers. “I was asking if they wanted to put a piece of art in the fucking thing,” he said. (The lawyers representing the defendants did not immediately respond to Artnet News’s request for further comment.)Įlden, a painter who once interned for artist Shepard Fairey, explained in a 2016 interview with GQ Australia that his view on the photograph changed after he reached out to Nirvana to see if the band would participate in an art show he was putting on. While they disputed that the image constitutes child sexual abuse material, they noted that the statute of limitations on Elden’s c laim for such a violation would have expired in 2011-two decades after the album’s release. “He has re-enacted the photograph in exchange for a fee, many times he has had the album title… tattooed across his chest he has appeared on a talk show wearing a self-parodying, nude-colored onesie he has autographed copies of the album cover for sale on eBay and he has used the connection to try to pick up women,” the lawyers wrote. The motion also pointed out that, for much of his life, Elden celebrated his connection to the band-and even profited from it. Nudity, they argued, must come with “other circumstances that make the visual depiction lascivious or sexually provocative” to be considered child pornography. They explained that, if Elden’s theory were accurate, anyone who owned a copy of the record would could be charged with felony possession of child pornography. “Elden’s claim that the photograph on the Nevermind album cover is ‘child pornography’ is, on its face, not serious,” the legal representatives for the band said in their motion to dismiss the case last month. The picture, taken at the Rose Bowl Aquatics Center in Pasadena, Calif., would be used that year for the cover of Nevermind, Nirvana’s seminal second album that helped define Generation X and. Nirvana’s team, meanwhile, remains steadfast that the suit has no merit. Ground Report New Delhi: Naked baby from ‘Nevermind’ Spencer Elden, who appeared naked as a baby on the cover of the album of 1991 Nirvana’s Nevermind, said has the work of iconic art of the album is child pgraphy and issuing the band for alleged exploitation infantile seual. Spencer Elden recreates his pose from the cover of Nirvana’s album Nevermind, shot when he was a baby, 25 years later.

Where is the baby from nirvana nevermind cover